What are you looking for?
CB1. That students have demonstrated knowledge and understanding in a field of study that is based on general secondary education, and is usually found at a level that, while supported by advanced textbooks, also includes some aspects. involving knowledge from the forefront of their field of study.
CB2. That students know how to apply their knowledge to their work or vocation in a professional way and possess the skills that are usually demonstrated through the development and defense of arguments and problem solving within their area of study.
CE2. Analyze the impacts generated by tourism in its economic, social and environmental aspects and provide innovative solutions.
CE18. Understand the characteristics of cultural heritage management and be able to develop innovative initiatives for its enhancement as a tourist attraction.
CG2. Be able to generate ideas and solve problems, both individually and collectively.
CG3. Be able to innovate by developing an open attitude to change and be willing to reevaluate old mental models that limit thinking.
CT1. Communicate properly orally and in writing in the two official languages of Catalonia.
CT2. Show willingness to learn about new cultures, experiment with new methodologies and encourage international exchange.
CT3. Formulate critical and well-argued reasoning, using precise terminology, specialized resources and documentation to support these arguments.
CT4. Demonstrate entrepreneurial leadership and leadership skills that build personal confidence and reduce risk aversion.
CT5. Master the main applications of computer tools and new technologies for ordinary academic activity.
CT6. Carry out tasks autonomously with the correct organization and timing of academic work.
CT7. Develop the ability to assess inequalities due to sex and gender to design solutions.
The classroom (physical or virtual) is a safe space, free of sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic and discriminatory attitudes, either towards students or teachers. We trust that together we can create a safe space where we can make mistakes and learn without having to suffer the prejudices of others.
Theoretical sessions:
MD1. Master class: Expository class sessions based on the teacher's explanation attended by all students enrolled in the subject.
MD3. Presentations: in multimedia formats.
Guided learning:
MD5. Seminars: Face-to-face format in small work groups. These are sessions linked to the theoretical sessions of the subject that allow to offer a practical perspective of the subject and in which the participation of the student is key.
MD7. Case study: Dynamics that starts from the study of a case, which serves to contextualize the student in a specific situation, the teacher can propose different activities, both individually and in groups, among their students.
Autonomous learning:
MD9. Solving exercises and problems: Non-contact activity dedicated to solving practical exercises based on the data provided by the teacher.
MD10. Research and critical reading of articles. Students start from a working hypothesis that they will develop, following the phases of the research methodology, including the critical reading of articles.
MD11. Non-contact tutorials: The student will have telematic resources such as e-mail and ESCSET intranet resources.
Topic 1. Tourism sustainability
1.1. Dimension of the tourism sector
1.2. Sustainable tourism
1.3. Change in tourism demand preferences
1.4. The value chain of tourism. Examples of good practice
1.5. Environmental assessment of tourism
Subject 2. Evaluation of the impact of the tourism
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Methodologies for impact assessment
AF1. Theoretical sessions
AF2. Seminars
AF3. Work in group
AF4. Individual work
- Participation in classroom activities, individual and group work: 40%
- Exhibitions: 10%
- Exam: 50%
Each part has a minimum grade of 4. In the recovery all parts can be recovered except group work.
Raya Vílchez, Josep Maria and Moreno-Torres, Ivan (2013). “Practical guide 9: introduction to economic evaluation”. Ivalua collection of practical guides. Ivalua.
Sancho, Amparo and Ruiz, Paz (2004). Methodological approach for the use of indicators in the tourist management of Protected Natural Areas ”, contribution to the IX AECIT Congress The tourist use of natural spaces. Logroño, 11 and 12 November 2004.
Sancho, Amparo; Garcia, Gregorio and Rozo, Edna. (2007). Comparison of sustainability indicators for developed destinations, in development and with vulnerable populations. Annals of Tourism Research, 9(1), 150-177.
Raya, Josep Maria; Martínez-Garcia, Esther and Celma, Dolors (2018). Economic and social yield of investing in hiking tourism: the case of Berguedà, Spain. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(2), 148-161.
Taks, Marijke; Késenne, Stefan; Chalip, Laurnence; Green, B.Christine and Martyn, Scott (2011). “Economic Impact Analysis Versus Cost Benefit Analysis: The Case of a Medium-Sized Sport Event.” International Journal of Sport Finance, 6, 187-203.
Barajas, Angel; Salgado, Jesica and Sánchez, Patricio (2012). "Problems of economic impact studies of sporting events." Applied Economics Studies 30 (2), 441-462.
From Rus Mendoza, Ginés (2008). "Cost-Benefit Analysis: Economic Evaluation of Investment Policies and Projects." Barcelona: Ariel.