What are you looking for?
CB4_That students can convey information, ideas, problems and solutions to an audience, both specialized and non-specialized
CB5_That students have developed those learning skills necessary to undertake further studies with a high degree of autonomy.
CB2_That students know how to apply their knowledge to their job or vocation in a professional way and have the skills that need to be demonstrated through the elaboration and defense of arguments and the resolution of problems within their area of study
CB1_That students have demonstrated knowledge and understanding of an area of study that is based on general education, and is usually found at a level that, while supported by advanced textbooks. Also includes some aspects that involve knowledge from the forefront of their field of study
CB3_That students have the ability to gather or interpret relevant data (usually within their area of study), to make judgments that include reflection on relevant social, scientific or ethical issues
CG11_Establish effective communication with patients, family, social groups and peers and promote health education
CG19_Enjoy autonomy and critical ability to use ICT
CT 1 Develop the ability to assess inequalities based on sex and gender, to design solutions
This subject aims to provide the student with tools that optimize the learning process.
The subject consists of an introduction to the use of methodological resources for searching scientific bibliography, understanding and organization of information in Health Sciences.
We also work on learning models, decision-making resources such as critical thinking, characteristics of a critical thinker and how to apply it to clinical practice.
The organization of the study, the work methodology, the cognitive strategies and the improvement of communication skills, both written and oral, are the basis for optimizing the integration of the student in the university world.
For this reason, from the beginning, the student is provided with methodologies to achieve the skills, which will be necessary in the development of his academic and personal career.
PRELIMINARY Session Week zero
Get to know the structure and operation of the UPF and the Tecnocampus educational project
BLOCK A
1. Communication in the field of nursing
2. Scientific writing
BLOCK B
1. Introductory concepts
2. Literature review
3. Bibliographic references and citations
4. Mendeley (Reference Manager)
BLOCK C
1. Learning styles. Time management
2. Critical thinking. Critical judgment in nursing
3. Clinical records and information transfer
4. Work development tutorials
The assessment system for the skills and learning outcomes of this subject includes different assessment activities for Subject 3 - Public Health, Communication and Research in Health:
Evaluation system | Minimum weighting | Maximum weighting |
SE1. Exam | 20% | 40% |
SE2. Individual works | 20% | 40% |
SE3. Teamwork | 20% | 40% |
SE4. Classroom participation | 5% | 40% |
SE5. Seminars | 10% | 50% |
SE7. Practical test | 5% | 40% |
A system of quantitative (from 0 to 10) and qualitative (suspended, approved, notable, excellent, honorary registration) is used according to RD 1125/2003.
The total or partial copy in any of the learning activities means a "Not Presented" in the subject, without option to present in the proof of recovery and without prejudice of the opening of a file for this reason.
According to UPF regulations, students who have the option of retrieving the subject are those who have obtained a “suspended” grade, which are the only ones that can be modified in the recovery process.
The evaluation system and recovery period are detailed in the Learning Plan available in the virtual classroom at the beginning of the subject.
De la Cueva, A., Aleixandre, R., Rodríguez, JM (2001). Sources of information in health sciences. University of Valencia.
Baró, T. (2011). Speaking and convincing: [recipes for making good public presentations]. Barcelona: Serbal.
Amadeo, I., & Sole´, J. (2009). Practical writing course. Barcelona: Educaula.
Boeglin Naumovic, M. (2007). Reading and writing in university: from the chaos of ideas to the structured text. Alcalá de Guadaíra¿: MAD.
Cassany, D. (2018). The kitchen of writing¿: an essential manual for all those who have to start writing. The Pocket
Cassany, D. (1999). Build the writing. Barcelona: Paido´s.
Cueva Martín, A. de la., Aleixandre Benavent, R., Rodríguez i Gairi´n, JM, & Universitat de València. (2001). Sources of information in health sciences. Valencia: University of Valencia.
Estrada, JM (2007). Chapter 2: Bibliographic search and its application in PubMed-MEDLINE. SEMERGEN - Family Medicine, 33 (4), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-3593(07)73875-3
Techniques for searching and using information. (2013). Madrid: Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces.
Turull, A., Ardanuy Baró, J., Arroyo and Amayuelas, E., & Arroyo and Amayuelas, E. (2017). Work and communication techniques¿: instrumentarium for the legal and social sciences. Barcelona¿: Huygens Editorial.
Lluch, G., & Nicolás, M. (2015). Academic writing¿: planning, documentation, writing, citation and models. Barcelona¿: Editorial UOC.
Pacios, AR (2013). Search techniques and use of information. Ramón Areces University Publishing.
Technocampus (2021). Information resources. https://www.tecnocampus.cat/biblioteca-crai/recursos-dinformacio
Open University of Catalonia. (2022). Open University of Catalonia. https://biblioteca.uoc.edu:8080/ca/plana/Estil-APA/
Critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment: a practical approach. Author:Rosalinda Alfaro-LeFevre 2021
Edition: Seventh edition. Publisher: Elsevier
Amat Salas, O., Rodrigo de Larrucea, J., & Rocafort Nicolau, A. (2017). How to do research¿: final degree project, master's thesis, doctoral thesis and other research projects (First ed.). Barcelona¿: Editorial Profit.