What are you looking for?
CB4_That students can convey information, ideas, problems and solutions to an audience, both specialized and non-specialized
CB5_That students have developed those learning skills necessary to undertake further studies with a high degree of autonomy.
CB2_That students know how to apply their knowledge to their job or vocation in a professional way and have the skills that need to be demonstrated through the elaboration and defense of arguments and the resolution of problems within their area of study
CB1_That students have demonstrated knowledge and understanding of an area of study that is based on general education, and is usually found at a level that, while supported by advanced textbooks. Also includes some aspects that involve knowledge from the forefront of their field of study
CB3_That students have the ability to gather or interpret relevant data (usually within their area of study), to make judgments that include reflection on relevant social, scientific or ethical issues
CG11_Establish effective communication with patients, family, social groups and peers and promote health education
The course consists of an introduction to the use of methodological resources for research, understanding and organization of information in Health Sciences.
(bibliography, documentation, references, citations, etc.).
This course aims to provide students with tools that optimize the learning process in academia.
The organization of the study, the work methodology, the cognitive strategies and the improvement of the communicative abilities are the base to optimize the integration of the student in the university world. For this reason, from the beginning, the student is provided with the resources that will be necessary in the development of his academic career.
This subject has methodological and digital resources to make possible its continuity in non-contact mode in the case of being necessary for reasons related to the Covid-19. In this way, the achievement of the same knowledge and skills that are specified in this teaching plan will be ensured.
The TecnoCampus will make available to teachers and students the digital tools needed to carry out the subject, as well as guides and
recommendations that facilitate the adaptation to the non-contact modality.
LO 1. To know the structure and operation of UPF and the ESCST educational project
LO 2. Know the different types of computer programs
LO 3. Acquire basic notions about Internet networks and health information.
LO 4. Identify the characteristics of the scientific literature.
LO 5. Identify the systemic and analytical perspective of disciplinary knowledge.
LO 6. Practice reflective narrative as a source of self-learning and self-assessment.
LO 7. Develop skills for reflective practice.
LO 35. Identify the skills required for teamwork.
LO 47. Consult and use sources of information and databases related to nursing.
MD1. Expository class sessions
MD4. Individual work
MD5. Presentations of topics by students
MD6. Face-to-face tutorials in groups or individually
MD11. Self-employment
PRELIMINARY Session Week zero
- To know the structure and operation of UPF and the Tecnocampus educational project
BLOCK A - Professor Elisabeth Rosell
1. Communication in the field of nursing
1.1. Adequacy
1.2. Consistency
1.3. Cohesion
1.4. The correction
2. Scientific writing
2.1. Objective of the scientific text
2.2. The style of the scientific text
2.3. Grammar at the service of scientific style
2.4. Written communication strategies
3. Oral communication strategies
3.1 Differences between writing and orality.
3.2 Characteristics of oral discourse.
3.3 Non-verbal and para-verbal language.
3.4 Analysis and practice of oral discourses.
BLOCK B - Professor Dr. Enric Camón
Search and use of scientific information
1. Introductory concepts
2. Introduction to information sources
2.1. Types of information sources
2.2. Controlled language and free language
2.3. bibliometry
3. Literature review
3.1. Phases in a search
3.2. The research question - PICO
3.3. approach
3.4. Strategies and instruments
4. Sources of information on nursing and health sciences
4.1. Resource directory
4.2. Resource analysis
4.3. Sources of information at the Tecnocampus
5. Bibliographic citations
5.1. basic concepts
5.2. How to quote?
5.2.1 Vancouver
5.2.2. THE WATER
6. Bibliographic reference managers
6.1. basic concepts
6.2 Mendeley
BLOCK C - Professor Dra. Carme Rosell
1. Get organized, indispensable. Time management
2. Critical thinking. Critical judgment in nursing
3.Clinical records and information transfer
4. Work development tutorials
With regard to the training activities and the methodology used in them, the following table summarizes them, including the credits assigned to each of the activities and the competencies that are worked on in them. The aim of this combination of activities is for the student to play an active role in their educational cycle and to interact with the rest of their classmates through cooperative learning activities, encouraging critical thinking.
Activity |
ECTS |
Methodology |
Skills |
AF1. Master class |
0,5 |
Face-to-face session attended by all students enrolled in the subject. In this session, the teacher presents the contents, usually with the support of multimedia presentations |
CB1, |
AF6. Work in group |
0,7 |
Debate, problem solving, case study |
CB2, CB3, CB4, CB5, CG11 |
AF7. Individual work |
0,2 |
Monitoring activities and formative evaluation to guide on learning concepts, skills and attitudes. Pedagogical guidelines to improve cooperative and individual learning. |
CB2, CB3, CB4, CB5, CG11 |
AF9. Personal study |
2,6 |
Readings of recommended texts, articles, guides, etc. Preparation of the topics for group work and presentation of the same. |
CB1 |
The evaluation of the generic and specific competences will be carried out continuously with the following activities:
Evaluation system |
Total weighting |
Partial weighting
|
|
SE1. EXAMINATION |
40% |
50% test part |
|
50% open questions |
|||
CONTINUED AVALUATION |
60% |
|
|
SE5. Seminars SE3. Teamwork |
70% |
20% Participation 80% Working memory |
|
SE7. Practical test Presentation |
30% |
The quantitative (from 0 to 10) and qualitative qualification system (suspended, approved, notable, excellent, honors registration) is used according to RD 1125/2003
Recovery
The recovery will be carried out with an examination with the same structure and weighting as that carried out in the 1st call.
Of the part of continuous evaluation, will only be able to recover the written memory, having to carry out an individual work, of similar characteristics to the 1st announcement.
According to UPF regulations, students will have the option of retrieving subjects that have obtained the qualification of 'suspended', which are the only ones that can be modified in the recovery process.
The total or partial copy in any of the learning activities will mean a "Not Presented" in the subject, without option to present in the proof of recovery and without prejudice of the opening of a file for this reason
Alfaro-LeFevre, R. (2009). Critical thinking and clinical judgment in nursing: a practical approach to results-centered thinking (4th ed.). Barcelona: Elsevier.
Amat Salas, O., Rodrigo de Larrucea, J., & Rocafort Nicolau, A. (2017). How to do research¿: final degree project, master's thesis, doctoral thesis and other research projects (First ed.). Barcelona¿: Editorial Profit.
Spanish Association of Primary Care Paediatrics., JC, & Ruiz-Canela Cáceres, J. (2005). Evidence in pediatrics. Evidence in Pediatrics, ISSN-e 1885-7388, Vol. 1, no. 1, 2005 (Vol. 1). Spanish Association of Pediatrics.
Baró, T. (2011). Speaking and convincing: [recipes for making good public presentations]. Barcelona: Serbal.
Amadeo, I., & Sole´, J. (2009). Practical writing course. Barcelona¿: Educaula.
Boeglin Naumovic, M. (2007). Reading and writing in university: from the chaos of ideas to the structured text. Alcalá de Guadaíra¿: MAD.
Cassany, D. (2018). The kitchen of writing¿: an essential manual for all those who have to start writing. The Pocket
Cassany, D. (1999). Build the writing. Barcelona [etc.] ¿: Paido´s.
Cueva Martín, A. de la., Aleixandre Benavent, R., Rodríguez i Gairi´n, JM, & Universitat de València. (2001). Sources of information in health sciences. Valencia: University of Valencia.
Estrada, JM (2007). Chapter 2: Bibliographic search and its application in PubMed-MEDLINE. SEMERGEN - Family Medicine, 33 (4), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-3593(07)73875-3
Mas, M., Vilagrasa Grandia, A., & Bartra Kaufmann, A. (2012). Catalan grammar from A to Z. Barcelona¿: Publications of the Abbey of Montserrat.
Techniques for searching and using information. (2013). Madrid: Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces.
Gonzalez de Dios Javier, B. Á. JC (2006). Efficient search for the best scientific evidence available in the literature: primary and secondary sources of information. Evidence in Pediatrics, 2, 1–10.
Turull, A., Ardanuy Baró, J., Arroyo and Amayuelas, E., & Arroyo and Amayuelas, E. (2017). Work and communication techniques¿: instrumentarium for the legal and social sciences. Barcelona¿: Huygens Editorial.
Gutiérrez Rodilla, BM (2005). The language of science. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.
Lluch, G., & Nicolás, M. (2015). Academic writing¿: planning, documentation, writing, citation and models. Barcelona¿: Editorial UOC.