What are you looking for?
Check the schedules of the different groups to know the language of teaching classes. Although the material can be in any of the three languages.
B2_That students know how to apply their knowledge to their job or vocation in a professional way and have the skills that need to be demonstrated through the elaboration and defense of arguments and the resolution of problems within their area of study
B3_Students have the ability to gather and interpret relevant data (usually within their area of study), to make judgments that include reflection on relevant social, scientific or ethical issues
B4_That students can convey information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialized and non-specialized audiences
B5_That students have developed those learning skills necessary to undertake further studies with a high degree of autonomy
E10_Recognize and understand the mechanisms of innovation and entrepreneurship and develop entrepreneurial initiative through theoretical models that fit a business idea
E11_Analyze and properly assess the scientific-technological and economic environment, both to look for innovative opportunities and to establish the necessary processes to adapt the organization to this environment
E12_Generate strategic skills by considering the operating environment as a project and establishing long-term, large-scale guidelines
E13_Create connections between people, collaborators and companies, contacting people who under normal circumstances would not match
E14_Identify emerging sectors and business innovation strategies applied in these sectors and compare them with each other
E15_Gather and interpret significant data to issue judgments that include a reflection on relevant topics in the business field and be able to prepare a document that allows information to be transmitted or an innovative business proposal
E5_Analyze business contexts, identify markets and customers and establish marketing strategies through the use of advanced and innovative techniques
E7_Elaborate projects and proposals of innovative companies establishing principles of social responsibility in the management and integrating the perspective of gender like indicators of quality and innovation
G1_ Be able to work in a team, actively participating in tasks and negotiating dissenting opinions to reach consensus positions, thus acquiring the ability to learn together with other team members and create new knowledge
G2_Be able to innovate by developing an open attitude to change and be willing to re-evaluate old mental models that limit thinking
T4_Domain the computer tools and their main applications for the ordinary academic and professional activity
T5_Develop tasks applying, with flexibility and creativity, the knowledge acquired and adapting it to new contexts and situations
The general objective of the subject is to acquire the basic knowledge, skills and competencies to develop innovative projects through collaborative work and creative tools.
The basic concepts related to the management of innovation, its terminology and the typologies of innovations will be analyzed. Next, students will take a journey through the creative process from identifying opportunities in the market, generating new ideas, prototyping and testing with potential users and consumers.
The classroom (physical or virtual) is a safe space, free of sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic and discriminatory attitudes, either towards students or teachers. We trust that together we can create a safe space where we can make mistakes and learn without having to suffer the prejudices of others.
1 Introduction to Innovation
2. The philosophy of innovation from the market
3. Introduction to Creativity
4. Techniques to encourage creativity
5. Evaluation and selection of ideas
7. Keys to presenting an innovative proposal
The work methodology will experientially combine theories and methodologies in relation to creativity and innovation, their application in different personal, social and especially organizational areas. This experiential methodology will be combined with dynamics and practical exercises in order to learn the details of implementing this type of approach to innovation and creativity. Students will progress through the different activities proposed:
SE1. Participation in the activities proposed in the classroom
SE2. Presentation and exhibition of individual and / or group work
SE4. Final exam
Evaluation during the term of teaching of the subject:
Evaluation in the recovery period:
The student who has not presented any of the activities of participation in the classroom in the first call will have to carry out some equivalent complementary activities (to define) to present to the recovery. The student who has not presented the individual and / or group work in the first call will not be able to present to the recovery. Only those who have submitted the work but have not approved it will be able to do so.
Amabile, TM (1996). The Motivation for Creativity in Organizations. Harvard Business School. Background Note, 396-240.
Kaufman, JC, & Beghetto, RA (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of general psychology, 13 (1), 1.
Amabile, TM (1998). How to Kill Creativity Harvard Business Review 76 (5): 76-87
Udwadia, FE (1990), “Creativity and innovation in organizations”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 38 No. 1, p. 66.
Chandy, Rajesh, and Jaideep Prabhu (2011) “Innovation Typologies”, in Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing, Barry Bayus (ed.), John Wiley and Sons, forthcoming.
Kathryn Baker, "Innovation," www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/doe/benchmark/ch14.pdf
Popadiuka, S., & Wei Choo, C. (2006) “Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related?” International Journal of Information Management, Vol.26, pp. 302–312.
Various authors (2010) Handbook of Business Creativity, Crea Business Idea.
Amabile, T. (2013). Componential theory of creativity. In E. Kessler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory. (pp. 135-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452276090.n42
Lehrer, J. (2008) “The Eureka Hunt” The New Yorker.
Miller, P., Brankovic, A. (2011) “Building a creative culture for Innovation.” IESE Insight, No. 11, Fourth Quarter 2011, pages 51-58.
Assink, M. (2006) “Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: A conceptual model”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9 (2), 215-233.
of Good, Edward. (1994) Creative thinking: the power of lateral thinking for the creation of new ideas. Paidós Ibérica (12th ed). Barcelona.
Miziolek, John. Design Thinking Starts At The Top. Fast Company, November 2, 2012. http://www.fastcompany.com/3002635/design-thinking-starts-top
Osborn, AF (1957) Applied Imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving, (Revised Ed.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Csikszentmihaly, M. (1996) Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, Harper Perennial.
Fernández Romero, A. (2005) Creativity and Innovation in companies and organizations. Problem solving techniques. Díaz de Santos. Madrid.
Johnson, Steven (2010) Where Good Ideas Come From. The Natural history of Innovation. Riverhead Books. New York.
Chesbrough, Henry William (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press. Boston.
Torrance, E. P. (1966) The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research.
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (1998) Creativity. The flow and psychology of discovery and invention. Paidós. Barcelona.
Amabile, TM (2012) The componential theory of creativity, Harvard Business School working paper to appear in Kessler, EH (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Management Theory, in press (Sage Publications, 2013)
Brown, Tim (2008) Design Thinking: Thinking like a designer can transform the way you develop your products, services, processes- and even strategy. Harvard Business Review.
Amabile, TM (2000) "A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations." In Research in Organizational Behavior. Flight. 22, edited by B. Staw and R. Sutton. Elsevier Science.
Christensen, Clayton (1997) The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Press. Boston.
of Good, Edward. (1999) Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
IDEA. Human Centered Design Toolkit. http://www.ideo.com/work/human-centered-design-toolkit/
Kim, KH (2006) Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT), Creativity Research Journal, 18 (1): 3 –14.